[Engine-devel] ovirt-engine deployment method

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Tue Apr 17 14:30:27 UTC 2012


On 04/17/2012 04:31 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:20 -0400, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
>> As decided earlier, oVirt next release (3.1) is targeted for Fedora
>> 17.
>> Since the engine uses JBoss, we have two deployment options:
>> 1. Continue working with ovirt-engine-jbossas package
>>     PROS: Single rpm. known upgrade method.
>>     CONS: Maintaining un-natural zip based rpm. No official support.
>> Can't be pushed into Fedora.
>>
>> 2. Move to JBoss F17 official packages:
>>     PROS: Fully supported F17 rpms (including bug fixes, security
>> fixes, etc). "The right thing to do".
>>     CONS: Upgrade from first release (relaying on old jboss) will be
>> almost impossible, Some open issues (will it work just as as normal
>> service? or will we need to code a new one?), Might cause a delay to
>> Feature Freeze.
>
> Quick thoughts -- this will come up for every release until we decide on
> #2.  The con for #2 will always be there until we finally switch over.
> I think it's less impact to have a more manual upgrade between release 1
> and 2 than between later releases.
>
> As long as we can provide at least a manual upgrade process with well
> defined steps so that the early adopters don't have to re-create their
> environments, I think we should go with #2.

+1



More information about the Arch mailing list