Unifying (parts of) engine and vdsm commit templates.

[Dan Kenigsberg]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:53:57AM -0400, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> > To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
> > Cc: arch at ovirt.org, "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>, "Igor Lvovsky" <ilvovsky at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:49:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: Unifying (parts of) engine and vdsm commit templates.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > 
> > >     Bug-Id: BZ#888888 dummy bz1
> > >     Bug-Id: BZ#888889 dummy bz2
> > >     Bug-Id: BZ#888890 dummy bz2
> > 
> > I think it's fine, though I find the "BZ#" string quite redundant
> > when
> > it appears after "Bug-Id: "
> > 
> 
> The BZ# was added (or kept) in order to allow <some> flexibility when referencing to different bug tracking systems (multiple name-spaces). For example, we may accept conventions of LP# for ubuntu launchpad.

Makes sense. I've seen rhbz# being used for that purpose.