Proposal for dropping packages from ovirt rpm repositories

Sandro Bonazzola sbonazzo at redhat.com
Wed Jan 22 14:11:38 UTC 2014


Il 22/01/2014 14:57, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I think that having the same package on different repositories must be avoided.
>>
>> The last python-cpopen-1.3 release broke repository closure of ovirt-stable which provides a vdsm release still requiring vdsm-python-cpopen.
>> I think that since vdsm and other packages are delivered in Fedora repositories we should not deliver them in ovirt repositories.
>> An example is:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056470
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056464
>>
>> python-cpopen affects both Fedora and oVirt repositories, hitting 2 different products.
>> but other packages are handled as vdsm.
>> So i suggest to keep just .tar.gz files on ovirt site for allowing fedora packagers to build referencing the source tarball and drop at all any
>> package already provided by Fedora from ovirt site.
>>
>> Comments as always are welcome.
> 
> Only problem with this is that epel would not agree to ship the el6
> build of rpm - we'd need to carry it on our own.

with epel we won't have duplicates in different repos

> 
> Dan.
> 


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com



More information about the Arch mailing list