[Engine-devel] minutes for sync up on Open Attestation integration with oVirt in 4/9

Chen, Wei D wei.d.chen at intel.com
Tue Apr 16 02:43:52 UTC 2013 

Hi, 
I just found there maybe another big performance issue. Currently, I am not sure how long this periodic check need, suppose there are 100+ hosts running in a trusted cluster, one host may take 3-5 seconds to poll attestation server, it will still take 5-9 mins to get all of the status for these hosts. Would we poll each host when this host's adding into cluster only once, as host's status change from trusted to untrusted and take effect is depended on host's reboot operation, is it possible for us to make it an event driven notification?


Best Regards,
Dave Chen

-----Original Message-----
From: engine-devel-bounces at ovirt.org [mailto:engine-devel-bounces at ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Doron Fediuck
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:06 PM
To: Itamar Heim
Cc: Oved Ourfalli; engine-devel at ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] minutes for sync up on Open Attestation integration with oVirt in 4/9



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> To: "Oved Ourfalli" <ovedo at redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:49:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] minutes for sync up on Open Attestation 
> integration with oVirt in 4/9
> 
> On 04/15/2013 09:20 AM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Wei D Chen" <wei.d.chen at intel.com>
> >> To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>, "Ofri Masad"
> >> <omasad at redhat.com>
> >> Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:54:18 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] minutes for sync up on Open Attestation 
> >> integration with oVirt in 4/9
> >>
> >> Hi Doron and Ofri,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your reply, here is some other question.
> >>
> >> ii.  When adding a host into the trusted cluster, the host will be 
> >> attested via OAT service, only trusted hosted can be added.
> >>
> >> Would you also kindly tell me if there is any mandatory logic check 
> >> when adding a host into a cluster, so we can also put attestation 
> >> logic with these mandatory check together? Some example or code location is better.
> >> Thanks a lot.
> >>
> >
> > I think there are two approaches, depending on the use case.
> > #1:
> > If the host trusted property is static, then you can narrow the 
> > tests to two locations:
> > * AddVdsCommand - (Vds = Host) - This command is triggered when a 
> > new host is added to the system. You can use the canDoAction method 
> > (which we have on all commands, and it determines whether an action 
> > can be run or not), and there, if cluster requires trusted hosts 
> > only, you can test whether this host is trusted or not.
> > * ChangeVdsClusterCommand - this command is used when you change the 
> > cluster of a host. So, if the target cluster requires tursted hosts, 
> > you can do a similar test in its canDoAction method.
> >
> > #2:
> > If the host trusted property can change, then I'd suggest using the 
> > NonOperational property of a host.
> > We have a class called VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo that does periodic tests 
> > of hosts, deciding what's their status, according to specific flags.
> > The code there is quite complex, and would require refactoring at 
> > some point, but in the meantime you can use the MonitoringStrategy 
> > interface that is being used there, and implement a new monitoring 
> > strategy for Open Attestation.
> >
> > There, in the processHardwareCapabilities, you can test that the 
> > host is trusted.
> >
> > When creating the strategy, using the MonitoringStrategyFactory, 
> > you'll need to create the appropriate strategy.
> > Currently we support either virt strategy or gluster strategy or 
> > both. In your case you would need virt+attestation / 
> > gluster+attestation /
> > virt+gluster+attestation, according to the services deployed on the
> > cluster.
> 
> I'd go with the 2nd approach. i.e., not block the host from being 
> added, only from being used, based on monitoring / non-op status
> 
+1.
It means that the admin can add the host, but the host will not be operational until we get a positive indication from the attestation service.

> 
> >
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> > Doron and Ofri, what did you have in mind for this feature?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Oved
> >
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Dave Chen
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Doron Fediuck [mailto:dfediuck at redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:03 PM
> >> To: Ofri Masad
> >> Cc: Wei, Gang; Chen, Wei D; Cao, Buddy; Zhang, Lijuan
> >> Subject: Re: minutes for sync up on Open Attestation integration 
> >> with oVirt in 4/9
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Ofri Masad" <omasad at redhat.com>
> >>> To: "Gang Wei" <gang.wei at intel.com>
> >>> Cc: "Wei D Chen" <wei.d.chen at intel.com>, "Buddy Cao"
> >>> <buddy.cao at intel.com>, "Lijuan Zhang" <lijuan.zhang at intel.com>, 
> >>> "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:23:57 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: minutes for sync up on Open Attestation integration 
> >>> with oVirt in 4/9
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> answers inside the mail body.
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
> >>>> To: "Wei D Chen" <wei.d.chen at intel.com>
> >>>> Cc: "Gang Wei" <gang.wei at intel.com>, "Buddy Cao"
> >>>> <buddy.cao at intel.com>, "Lijuan Zhang" <lijuan.zhang at intel.com>, 
> >>>> "Ofri Masad" <omasad at redhat.com>
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:12:26 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: minutes for sync up on Open Attestation integration 
> >>>> with oVirt in 4/9
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Dave,
> >>>> Adding Ofri to answer your questions.
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "Wei D Chen" <wei.d.chen at intel.com>
> >>>>> To: "Gang Wei" <gang.wei at intel.com>, "Doron Fediuck"
> >>>>> <dfediuck at redhat.com>,
> >>>>> "Buddy Cao" <buddy.cao at intel.com>, "Lijuan Zhang"
> >>>>> <lijuan.zhang at intel.com>
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:31:05 AM
> >>>>> Subject: RE: minutes for sync up on Open Attestation integration 
> >>>>> with oVirt in 4/9
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Doron,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> iii.    Then periodic trust check will be added into background process
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> all existing hosts, once becoming non-trusted, mark it as 
> >>>>> non-operational.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -          [Dave] Would you give me some details about the “background
> >>>>> process” mentioned in our sync up meeting? What’s the process 
> >>>>> and where is related code?
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> The use Quartz Job to scheduled background processes.
> >>> An example can be found in:
> >>> ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/Backend.java(Line:
> >>> 222)
> >>>
> >>> This code calls a method that is located in:
> >>> ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/e
> >>> ngin e/core/bll/quota/QuotaManager.java
> >>> (Line: 1000)
> >>> the @OnTimerMethodAnnotation annotation and the unique job name 
> >>> connects the two in runtime.
> >>>
> >>> The job can query the attestation server for all the host and then 
> >>> set untrusted hosts to Non-Operational.
> >>> the best way would be to call SetNonOperationalVdsCommand with a 
> >>> new NonOperationalReason.
> >>> This command tries to migrate all VMs from the host and then set 
> >>> it non operational.
> >>> (We need to think about non-migrational VMs - should we close 
> >>> those VMs or keep the host running)
> >>>
> >>
> >> One more thing you may want to consider; If we get a positive 
> >> response for a host which is currently non-operational, issue an 
> >> activate command to try and make it operational again.
> >> Alternatively, you may decide not to handle it, assuming untrusted 
> >> hosts can only be activated manually (see below Ofri's response on 
> >> activating a host).
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> iv.     If admin fixed the non-operational node and try to switch it to
> >>>>> operational mode again, a trust check will happen to gate the 
> >>>>> switching.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -          [Dave] If there is a button provided from UI  for checking
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> logic? or we need add an extra-button for attestation check only?
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> In the UI we already have the "Activate" option. What still needs 
> >>> to be added is the check with the attestation provider to make 
> >>> sure that if the cluster is defined 'Trusted'. If so, only trusted 
> >>> host will succeed in the activate command (and, of course, a 
> >>> proper Audit Log error in case the host failed to activate due to trust issue.
> >>>
> >>> the correct place to add this check would be in:
> >>> ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/vdsbroker/src/main/java/org/o
> >>> virt
> >>> /engine/core/vdsbroker/VdsManager.java:activate()
> >>> this is where the re-activation process begins.
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks very much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Dave Chen
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Engine-devel mailing list
> >> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

More information about the Devel mailing list