[ovirt-devel] [VDSM] upgrading pylint - new errors

Nir Soffer nsoffer at redhat.com
Mon Dec 18 23:42:32 UTC 2017 

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:30 AM Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:04 AM Irit Goihman <igoihman at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I pushed two patches fixing some of the issues:
>>>
>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85318/
>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85316/
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response!
>>
>> I sent this for the libvirt events, turns out the code is mostly correct,
>> assuming
>> that libvirt does not add new arguments to the callback api, but pylint
>> cannot
>> verify this.
>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85351/
>>
>> With this we have only these errors:
>>
>> ************* Module vdsm.v2v*00:07:29.177* *E*:1368,27: *Instance of 'closing' has no 'read' member* (*no-member*)
>>
>>
>> This is handled by https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85318/
>> but I think we can do a better fix *without* disabling any warning,
>> see the comment in:
>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85318/3/lib/vdsm/v2v.py@1369
>>
>> *00:07:29.182* ************* Module vdsm.tool.configurator*00:07:29.186* *E*:118,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:07:29.191* *E*:158,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:07:29.195* *E*:193,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:07:29.198* *E*:215,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)
>>
>>
>> This is handled by https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/85316/
>> but I don't understand the fix. The code seems fine
>> and the fix make it worse.
>>
>> *00:07:29.201* ************* Module vdsm.virt.vm_migrate_hook*00:07:29.204* *E*:199, 4: *No value for argument 'domain' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:07:29.206* *E*:199, 4: *No value for argument 'event' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:07:29.208* *E*:199, 4: *No value for argument 'phase' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)
>>
>>
>> Francesco, can you look at these?
>>
>
> Actually, that's owned by network; I hope Petr can fix it on Friday.
>

These are the only errors now:

*00:05:45.790* ************* Module
vdsm.virt.vm_migrate_hook*00:05:45.796* *E*:199, 4: *No value for
argument 'domain' in function call*
(*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:05:45.803* *E*:199, 4: *No value for
argument 'event' in function call*
(*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:05:45.810* *E*:199, 4: *No value for
argument 'phase' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)


Using pylint 1.8, released 4 days ago.



>
>> *00:07:29.210* ************* Module vdsm.network.netlink.monitor*00:07:29.212* *E*:172,58: *Instance of 'closing' has no 'poll' member* (*no-member*)
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm trying to upgrade pylint to latest so we can enjoy latest fixes
>>>> like this:
>>>> https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/1736
>>>>
>>>> Now we have some new errors, please check.
>>>>
>>>> ************* Module vdsm.clientIF*00:06:53.857* *E*:588,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 2 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 587             if eventid == libvirt.VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_LIFECYCLE:
>>>> 588                 event, detail = args[:-1]
>>>> 589                 v.onLibvirtLifecycleEvent(event, detail, None)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Code is indeed incorrect, should be:
>>>>
>>>>     event, detail = args[:2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *00:06:53.859* *E*:593,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 1 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)*00:06:53.861* *E*:596,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 4 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)*00:06:53.863* *E*:599,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 5 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)*00:06:53.867* *E*:610,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 1 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)*00:06:53.869* *E*:615,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 1 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)*00:06:53.872* *E*:618,16: *Possible unbalanced tuple unpacking with sequence: left side has 4 label(s), right side has 0 value(s)* (*unbalanced-tuple-unpacking*)*00:06:53.873* ************* Module vdsm.v2v*00:06:53.874* *E*:1368,27: *Instance of 'closing' has no 'read' member* (*no-member*)*00:06:53.876* ************* Module vdsm.tool.configurator*00:06:53.878* *E*:118,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.880* *E*:158,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.881* *E*:193,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.883* *E*:215,12: *No value for argument 'action' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.885* ************* Module vdsm.virt.vm_migrate_hook*00:06:53.886* *E*:199, 4: *No value for argument 'domain' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.888* *E*:199, 4: *No value for argument 'event' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.890* *E*:199, 4: *No value for argument 'phase' in function call* (*no-value-for-parameter*)*00:06:53.892* ************* Module vdsm.network.netlink.monitor*00:06:53.893* *E*:172,58: *Instance of 'closing' has no 'poll' member* (*no-member*)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> IRIT GOIHMAN
>>>
>>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>>>
>>> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>>>
>>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>> @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171218/94cd44e1/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Devel mailing list