[ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 GA status

[Martin Sivak]

There is no misuse when optional argument is not used. But hosted engine
uses the timeout parameter anyway so you can assume it is not a blocker for
us.

Martin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Martin Perina <mperina at redhat.com> wrote:

> As Irit mentioned the provided reproduction steps are wrong (misuse of the
> code) and she posted correct example showing that jsonrpc code works as
> expected. So Martin/Simone are you using somewhere in HE code the original
> example that is misusing the client?
>
> Thanks
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourfali at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> From the latest comment it doesn't seem like a blocker to me.
>> Martin S. - your thoughts?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We have a proposed blocker for the release:
>>> 1527155 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527155> Infra vdsm
>>> Bindings-API igoihman at redhat.com NEW jsonrpc reconnect logic does not
>>> work and gets stuck
>>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527155> urgent unspecified
>>> ovirt-4.2.0 04:30:30
>>>
>>> Please review and either approve the blcoker or postpone to 4.2.1.
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>>>
>>> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>>>
>>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Martin Perina
> Associate Manager, Software Engineering
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171219/afbb9cad/attachment.html>