<div dir="ltr">👍</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nir Soffer <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com" target="_blank">nsoffer@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Dan Kenigsberg &lt;<a href="mailto:danken@redhat.com">danken@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 09:58:50PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; This test still fails randomly, maybe once week.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Are we planning to investigate this test, or mark it as broken_on_ci?<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Nir<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; ----<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 ==============================<wbr>==============================<wbr>==========<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 FAIL: test_ip_info (network.netinfo_test.<wbr>TestNetinfo)<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 ------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>----------<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 Traceback (most recent call last):<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03   File<br>
&gt;&gt; &quot;/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_<wbr>master_check-patch-fc24-x86_<wbr>64/vdsm/tests/testValidation.<wbr>py&quot;,<br>
&gt;&gt; line 97, in wrapper<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03     return f(*args, **kwargs)<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03   File<br>
&gt;&gt; &quot;/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_<wbr>master_check-patch-fc24-x86_<wbr>64/vdsm/tests/network/netinfo_<wbr>test.py&quot;,<br>
&gt;&gt; line 359, in test_ip_info<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03     [IPV6_ADDR_CIDR]))<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 AssertionError: Tuples differ: (&#39;192.0.2.2&#39;,<br>
&gt;&gt; &#39;255.255.255.0&#39;,... != (&#39;192.0.2.2&#39;, &#39;255.255.255.0&#39;,...<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 First differing element 2:<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 [&#39;<a href="http://192.0.2.2/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.2/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.9/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.9/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.11/32" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.11/32</a>&#39;]<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 [&#39;<a href="http://192.0.2.2/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.2/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.9/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.9/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.11/32" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.11/32</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://192.0.2.3/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.3/24</a>&#39;]<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03   (&#39;192.0.2.2&#39;,<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03    &#39;255.255.255.0&#39;,<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 -  [&#39;<a href="http://192.0.2.2/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.2/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.9/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.9/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.11/32&#39;" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.11/32&#39;</a>],<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 +  [&#39;<a href="http://192.0.2.2/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.2/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.9/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.9/24</a>&#39;, &#39;<a href="http://198.51.100.11/32" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">198.51.100.11/32</a>&#39;,<br>
&gt;&gt; &#39;<a href="http://192.0.2.3/24&#39;" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.3/24&#39;</a>],<br>
&gt;&gt; 13:51:03 ?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Ouch, we&#39;re waiting for <a href="http://192.0.2.3/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.0.2.3/24</a> (IP_ADDR_2ND_CIDR) yet get_ip_info()<br>
&gt; does not report it.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; This sounds like a tough bug to crush, but maybe Leon can prove me<br>
&gt; wrong. Let&#39;s give it a week or two?<br>
<br>
</div></div>Sure<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>