<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">AFAIK we don't need any new features or bug fixes, so we can stay with version 3.x for 4.2.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Thanks<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Martin<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Juan Hernández <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jhernand@redhat.com" target="_blank">jhernand@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 06/15/2017 08:36 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
> just an heads up that a new release of UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java is<br>
> available upstream.<br>
> I'm going to build it for Fedora Rawhide, please let me know if we need<br>
> it for 4.2, requiring a backport to Fedora 25 / 26 and EL7 or if it can<br>
> just stay in Rawhide for ovirt >= 4.3 consumption.<br>
><br>
> Here the release<br>
> notes: <a href="https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/releases/tag/4.0.0" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/<wbr>pingidentity/ldapsdk/releases/<wbr>tag/4.0.0</a><br>
><br>
> Fedora tracking bug: Bug 1461604<br>
> <<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461604" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/<wbr>show_bug.cgi?id=1461604</a>> - unboundid-ldapsdk-4.0.0<br>
> is available<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
<br>
Is 4.0 backwards compatible with 3.y.z? Should it be a new whatever4<br>
package?<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>