<div dir="ltr">Do we have or follow a standard on patch granularity? When I started, I picked up on the culture that we do small, logical commits -- as much as possible, each commit should be focused on a specific purpose. I've perceived some reviewers prefer to have all orthogonal changes (fix a random spelling error, remove a duplicate semicolon) extracted to other patches for clarity. Others don't seem to mind. I feel like I always want to ask, but I feel bad because it's a hassle.<div><br></div><div>Also, when you are asked to extract something, do you have a trick to make it as easy as possible?<br><div><br></div><div>Best wishes,</div><div>Greg</div><div><br></div><div><div><div><div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Greg Sheremeta, MBA<br><span style="font-size:12.8px">Sr. Software Engineer</span><br></div><div>Red Hat, Inc.<br><a href="mailto:gshereme@redhat.com" target="_blank">gshereme@redhat.com</a><br></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div>