<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Barak Korren <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bkorren@redhat.com" target="_blank">bkorren@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-">On 6 September 2017 at 10:58, Simone Tiraboschi <<a href="mailto:stirabos@redhat.com">stirabos@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> We already found an rpm dependency issue on upgrade so now I'd say:<br>
> <a href="https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81478" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81478</a> and <a href="https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81476" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81476</a> (still to<br>
> be merged) in order to solve also that issue.<br>
><br>
</span>Hmm... I thought the upgrade issue was what we were discussing.<br>
<br>
I triggered a CQ run with the latest merged engine and dwh patches. If<br>
I understand correctly it is doomed to fail as well?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, two distinct issue:</div><div><br></div><div>if you don't test the two previous patch at the same time it's going to fail with </div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:12.8px">engine-setup --config-append=/tmp/answer-<wbr>file-post --accept-defaults</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">returned with 2</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">output:</div><div style="font-size:12.8px"> ***L:ERROR Internal error: type object 'DBEnvKeysConst' has no attribute 'NEED_DBMSUPGRADE'</div></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">if you have both yesterday patches it was going to fail due to the lack of rh-postgresql95-postgresql-server</div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><a href="https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81478/">https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81478/</a> should be enough to require r</span><span style="font-size:12.8px">h-postgresql95-postgresql-server by itself,</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">so if DWH is part of the upgrade test, I hope it will pass.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Thanks!</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail-HOEnZb"><div class="gmail-h5"><br>
--<br>
Barak Korren<br>
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi<br>
Red Hat EMEA<br>
<a href="http://redhat.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">redhat.com</a> | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | <a href="http://redhat.com/trusted" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">redhat.com/trusted</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>