<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danken@redhat.com" target="_blank">danken@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-"><br>
</span>Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more<br>
importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak slave utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older Fedora versions.<br><br></div><div>I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide testing is useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time...<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Nir, with your experience - does it worth it?<br>
<br>
How about having "rawhide" as non-voting?<br>
</blockquote></div><br><div>You can accomplish that easily - just add a
'check-patch.sh.fcraw' script that would source the normal
'check-patch.sh' and throw away the process return value.<br></div><div><br></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Barak Korren<br>RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi<br>Red Hat EMEA<br><a href="http://redhat.com" target="_blank">redhat.com</a> | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | <a href="http://redhat.com/trusted" target="_blank">redhat.com/trusted</a></div>
</div></div>