<div dir="ltr">Point taken.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Martin Sivak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:msivak@redhat.com" target="_blank">msivak@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these,<br>
> like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users to<br>
> understand.<br>
> We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user<br>
> facing documentation.<br>
<br>
</span>And yet we require the user to select a team using the same terms when<br>
filing a new bug..<br>
<br>
I agree with you, but I think the mandatory field in bugzilla is<br>
another candidate for consideration.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Martin<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Barak Korren <<a href="mailto:bkorren@redhat.com">bkorren@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 15 November 2017 at 17:47, John Marks <<a href="mailto:jmarks@redhat.com">jmarks@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Hi,<br>
>> Thanks to everyone who helped with the feature categorization effort on the<br>
>> ovirt feature page.<br>
>><br>
>> We've made significant progress, and thanks also to Eldan's UX work, the<br>
>> page is looking much better organized.<br>
>><br>
>> There are a few simple things you can do to help keep the page organized,<br>
>> and to improve it.<br>
>><br>
>> 1. Adding a new feature to <a href="http://ovirt.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">ovirt.org</a>:<br>
>><br>
>> Please add your feature to a suitable category:<br>
>> - Gluster (The location in the repository is:<br>
>> /develop/release-management/<wbr>features/gluster)<br>
>> - Infra (Same pattern as above)<br>
>> - Integration<br>
>> - Metrics<br>
>> - Network<br>
>> - Node<br>
>> - SLA<br>
>> - Storage<br>
>> - UX<br>
>> - VDSM<br>
>> - Virt<br>
><br>
> I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these,<br>
> like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users to<br>
> understand.<br>
> We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user<br>
> facing documentation.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Barak Korren<br>
> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi<br>
> Red Hat EMEA<br>
> <a href="http://redhat.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">redhat.com</a> | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | <a href="http://redhat.com/trusted" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">redhat.com/trusted</a><br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Devel@ovirt.org">Devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>John Marks</div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Technical Writer, oVirt</span></div></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">redhat Israel</span><br></div><div>Cell: +972 52 8644 491<br><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>