<div dir="auto">Yes, I can do that. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">17.11.2017 21:27 "Nir Soffer" <<a href="mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com">nsoffer@redhat.com</a>> napisał(a):<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:36 AM Dan Kenigsberg <<a href="mailto:danken@redhat.com" target="_blank">danken@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Barak Korren <<a href="mailto:bkorren@redhat.com" target="_blank">bkorren@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <<a href="mailto:danken@redhat.com" target="_blank">danken@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more<br>
>> importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures.<br>
><br>
><br>
> I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak slave<br>
> utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older Fedora<br>
> versions.<br>
><br>
> I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide testing is<br>
> useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time...<br>
><br>
>> Nir, with your experience - does it worth it?<br>
>><br>
>> How about having "rawhide" as non-voting?<br>
><br>
><br>
> You can accomplish that easily - just add a 'check-patch.sh.fcraw' script<br>
> that would source the normal 'check-patch.sh' and throw away the process<br>
> return value.<br>
<br>
This would eliminate the only benefit I see in having rawhide at all:<br>
I'd like to see the rawhide job in RED if it is currently broken, so I<br>
can look deeper to see why. If it's always green, it's useless to me.<br>
However, if it is often red due to temporary unrelated changes, I<br>
would not like it to block fixes.<br>
<br>
But as you say, we can try it out and check the signal/noise ratio.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I sent patches for ovirt-imageio, we need similar patches for vdsm.</div><div><a href="https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84309/" target="_blank">https://gerrit.ovirt.org/<wbr>84309/</a><br></div><div><a href="https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84308/" target="_blank">https://gerrit.ovirt.org/<wbr>84308/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Piotr, can you handle this for vdsm?</div><div><br></div><div>Nir</div><div> </div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>