[Engine-devel] oVirt upstream meeting : VM Version

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Thu Feb 2 06:46:46 UTC 2012


On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
> Hi
>
> We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
> One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined as an open issue in the feature wiki) is:
> What happens to a 3.1 VM running on 3.1 Cluster when it is moved to a 3.0 cluster.
> We encountered that VM may lose some configuration data but also may be corrupted.
>  From that point we got to the conclusion that we have somehow to maintain a VM Version that will allow us to
> block moving VM if it's version is not fully supported compatible with the target Cluster.
> One idea for getting the VM version is the OVF which actually holds inside its header OvfVersion.
> The question is , is the OVF good enough for all our needs or should we persist that else (for example in DB)
> Also, any other issues/difficulties we may encounter implementing and storing VM version.
>
> Keep in mind that this is a new feature that impacts the Stable Device Addresses feature but may be useful/relevant
> for other features as well.

Can you give some examples which will cause an issue moving a VM from a 
3.1 cluster to a 3.0 one?



More information about the Engine-devel mailing list