[Engine-devel] Do we need genericApi project?

Gilad Chaplik gchaplik at redhat.com
Sun Jun 10 09:08:50 UTC 2012


we don't use GetUserActionGroups (it's an unreachable code - can be deleted), IMHO we can remove the project.

Thanks, 
Gilad.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> To: "Michael Kublin" <mkublin at redhat.com>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:48:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Do we need genericApi project?
> 
> On 06/10/2012 11:23 AM, Michael Kublin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found that we have a ovirt-engine/frontend/api/genericapi
> > project, which is for my opinion is not at use any more.
> > If there are any reason that we want to keep it , maybe someone
> > using it and I missed these?
> >
> > Thanks Michael
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> 
> iirc, it's intended to allow to add queries needed for the UI without
> adding them into the core.
> and looking at GetUserActionGroups, I see it is used for example by
> uicommon.
> 
> (GWT still uses the generic api)
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> 



More information about the Engine-devel mailing list