[Engine-devel] Engine Configuration API

Eli Mesika emesika at redhat.com
Mon Mar 4 23:39:10 UTC 2013



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ori Liel" <oliel at redhat.com>
> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 5:24:52 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] Engine Configuration API
> 
> I am adding the ability to display and update engine configuration
> parameters through the REST API.
> 
> Working on this has raised a lot of dilemmas. The one I want to focus
> on here is:
> 
>    "Which configuration items do you think should be managed through
>    the API?"
> 
> Possible answers (you can add different ones too):
> 
> 1) All items (the entire contents of VDC_OPTIONS, mirrored in the
> engine enum: ConfigValues.java).
> 2) Only the items in engine enum ConfigurationValues.java (an enum
> which IIUC was created in the past for GUI, and contains a subset of
> the items in the engine enum ConfigValues.java)
> 3) Only the items exposed by engine-config-tool.

+1
Other values are internal and should not be exposed to the user
> 
> When I set out to work on this task, I was under the assumption that
> the API should show what the GUI shows (option 2). But since then
> I've found out that the set of items in engine-config-tool isn't
> identical to that in ConfigurationValues.java, and I've also heard
> the opinion that the API should show all values in vdc_options
> (option 1), because the clients of the API (& SDK, & CLI) are
> developers (as opposed to clients of GUI, which can be more though
> of as 'users').
> 
> I'd be glad to hear some opinions about this, especially PM input
> would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ori.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> 



More information about the Engine-devel mailing list