<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<tt>I by mistake sent this earlier to users@ovirt<br>
I think the right list is engine-devel, hence resending. Sorry for
the mispost earlier.<br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
<br>
-------- Original Message --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Subject:
</th>
<td>vfs_type not being sent by engine to VDSM for GLUSTER
DOMAIN case</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Date: </th>
<td>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:23:57 +0530</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">From: </th>
<td>Deepak C Shetty <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deepakcs@linux.vnet.ibm.com"><deepakcs@linux.vnet.ibm.com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Organization:
</th>
<td>IBM India Pvt. Ltd.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">To: </th>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:users@ovirt.org">users@ovirt.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:users@ovirt.org"><users@ovirt.org></a>, Sharad Mishra
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:snmishra@us.ibm.com"><snmishra@us.ibm.com></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<tt>Hi All,<br>
I am validating GLUSTERFS Storage domain engine patches
(worked on by Sharad, in Cc) as posted here...<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+topic:glusterfs,n,z">http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+topic:glusterfs,n,z</a><br>
against VDSM Glusterfs domain support (already upstream in VDSM)<br>
<br>
I see the below issue as part of me creatign a new Gluster
Storage DOmain in the UI<br>
<br>
Engine logs...<br>
<br>
2013-03-18 13:27:29,149 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.ConnectStorageServerVDSCommand]
(http--0.0.0.0-8700-1) [4b751967] START,
ConnectStorageServerVDSCommand(HostName = vm-vdsm-de-1, HostId =
c0ff5edc-4e30-4553-9125-2d1cee9f19ec, storagePoolId =
00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, storageType = GLUSTERFS,
connectionList = [{ id: null, connection: vm-vdsm-de-1:dpkvol4,
iqn: null, vfsType: glusterfs, mountOptions: null, nfsVersion:
null, nfsRetrans: null, nfsTimeo: null };]), log id: f88d42d<br>
<br>
VDSM Logs...<br>
<br>
Thread-77::<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="INFO::2013-03-18">INFO::2013-03-18</a>
13:32:35,541::logUtils::44::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and
protect: connectStorageServer(domType=7,
spUUID='00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000',
conList=[{'connection': 'vm-vdsm-de-1:dpkvol4', 'iqn': '',
'portal': '', 'user': '', 'password': '******', 'id':
'00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000', 'port': ''}],
options=None)<b> --> Notice no vfs_type here !!!</b><br>
<br>
VDSM doesn't recv. the vfs_type in the conList dict !!!<br>
<br>
I had this small chat with Saggi of VDSM, just to confirm that
there isn't a possibility that VDSM might be stripping args that
are recd. from Engine.. and it doesn't.<br>
<br>
</tt><br>
<tt><tt>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</tt><deepakcs> saggi, Hi<br>
<saggi> deepakcs: hi<br>
<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, Is it possible that VDSM might strip
down some of the connparams that are recd. as part of
connectStorageServer ?<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, In engine log for GLUSTERFS_DOMAIN i see
vfsType being passed, but connectStorageServer log doesn't show
vfs_type in the params dict<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, so wodering where vfs_type is getting
dropped in this whole process<br>
<saggi> Probably not being sent<br>
<saggi> if it's not being logged<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, engine log has this....<br>
<deepakcs> 2013-03-18 13:27:29,149 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.ConnectStorageServerVDSCommand]
(http--0.0.0.0-8700-1) [4b751967] START,
ConnectStorageServerVDSCommand(HostName = vm-vdsm-de-1, HostId =
c0ff5edc-4e30-4553-9125-2d1cee9f19ec, storagePoolId =
00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, storageType = GLUSTERFS,
connectionList = [{ id: null, connection: vm-vdsm-de-1:dpkvol4,
iqn: null, vfsType: glusterfs, mountOptions: null, nfsVersion:
nul<br>
<deepakcs> l, nfsRetrans: null, nfsTimeo: null };]), log
id: f88d42d<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, on VDSM side i see this...<br>
<deepakcs> Thread-77::<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="INFO::2013-03-18">INFO::2013-03-18</a>
13:32:35,541::logUtils::44::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and
protect: connectStorageServer(domType=7,
spUUID='00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000',
conList=[{'connection': 'vm-vdsm-de-1:dpkvol4', 'iqn': '',
'portal': '', 'user': '', 'password': '******', 'id':
'00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000', 'port': ''}],
options=None) --> Notice no vfs_type here !!!<br>
<saggi> Then you are not sending the correct connection
type<br>
<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, 'you' means the engine side of code ?
engine patches is being done by Sharad, and I amtrying to work
with them on this issue<br>
<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, domType=7 is GLUSTERFS_DOMAIN, so its
correct on that front<br>
<saggi> If it show nfsRetrans you are using nfs which
doesn't have a vfs_type argument<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, but engine log says storageType =
GLUSTERFS<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, maybe i can send mail to users@ovirt
list to see if anybody can provide more clues<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, but definitely this doesn't looks like a
vdsm side of issue rite ?<br>
<saggi> We log the params as we get them<br>
<br>
<deepakcs> saggi, right, thats what i also see.. just
wanted to confirm once with you, before i sent mail to ovirt
folks<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
<br>
Can someone help provide any clues on what might be the issue
here ?<br>
Because VDSM doesn't see vfs_type, the connectStorageServer
fails and hence new SD cannot be created !<br>
<br>
thanx,<br>
deepak<br>
<br>
</tt><br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>