[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] vdsm_master_install-rpm-sanity-el6_created bugged and vdsm spec file broken

Ondřej Svoboda osvoboda at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 13:24:41 UTC 2014


Hi,

I am in favor of tagging e.g. the commit introducing the hook in question [1] with v4.16.99.
(Similarly, in the message to ovirt-users [2] I suggested that anyone interested in the hook tag their master branch with "v4.17-fake".)
I think that the tag v4.17 is very similar to the eventual tag v4.17.0 and might be confusing or sounding like a "hack"; but they are different tags nonetheless so I am not opposed to this solution either.

Introducing the tag would make installing the hook painless to both groups (those on v4.16.7; and those on master, i.e., post-v4.16.0).

[1] hooks: Add a hook to configure IPv6 networking through custom properties e42c9f3e9a2a4f759a66f11b3572d21c2b28d7c6
[2] IPv6 configuration through custom network properties and vdsm-hook-ipv6

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
To: devel at ovirt.org, "infra" <infra at ovirt.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:25:09 AM
Subject: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] vdsm_master_install-rpm-sanity-el6_created bugged and vdsm spec file broken

Looking at: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_install-rpm-sanity-el6_created/570/console

The job is trying to install the src.rpm and fails:

16:45:09 Cannot add package /tmp/vdsm-4.16.0-501.gitf981b80.el6.src.rpm to transaction. Not a compatible architecture: src
16:45:11 Cannot add package /tmp/vdsm-4.16.0-501.gitf981b80.fc20.src.rpm to transaction. Not a compatible architecture: src

After that, some rpms fails the install:
Package: vdsm-hook-ipv6-4.16.0-501.gitf981b80.el6.noarch (/vdsm-hook-ipv6-4.16.0-501.gitf981b80.el6.noarch)
16:45:34            Requires: vdsm >= 4.16.7

Master must bump version to 4.16.99 or 4.17 or something like that in order to be installable.

Last thing:
Cents 6.6 now deliver glusterfs 3.6.0.28 and vdsm is explicitly requiring 3.5.2.
Anything preventing to move to >= 3.5.2 instead of = 3.5.2?

-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



More information about the Infra mailing list