puppet failed because no ppc64 repo

Sandro Bonazzola sbonazzo at redhat.com
Mon Mar 30 14:21:09 UTC 2015


Il 30/03/2015 16:20, Eyal Edri ha scritto:
> adding infra also.
> 
> 2 options:
>  1. do we need this patternfly for ppc ovirt hypervisors? if so, let's find the relevant maintainers and ask for a build
>  2. if we don't need it, lets exclude it from puppet.

As far as I know, it's used only by the engine


> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Caro Estevez" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
>> To: "Sagi Shnaidman" <sshnaidm at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Eyal Edri" <eedri at redhat.com>, sbonazzo at redhat.com
>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:13:04 PM
>> Subject: Re: puppet failed because no ppc64 repo
>>
>>
>> They don't seem to be building for ppc64 at all...
>>
>>
>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/patternfly/patternfly1/
>>
>>
>> @Sandro: Do you know who to nag?
>>
>> On 03/30, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
>>> David,
>>> my last puppet run on ppc64 node failed because of lacking "ppc64"
>>> architecture in following repo:
>>> http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/patternfly/patternfly1/
>>>
>>> the errors could be seen here:
>>> http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/272970
>>>
>>> What is that repo for and do you know how to workaround this problem?
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S. Have you added my keys to second ppc64 vm for access it?
>>>
>>
>> --
>> David Caro
>>
>> Red Hat S.L.
>> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>>
>> Tel.: +420 532 294 605
>> Email: dcaro at redhat.com
>> Web: www.redhat.com
>> RHT Global #: 82-62605
>>


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com



More information about the Infra mailing list