[ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master ] [ 9/4/2017 ] [ add_secondary_storage_domains ]

[Martin Betak]

Actually it appears that this failure is not engine related (tried
reverting my patches from saturday but still received similar errors with
lago in the [ add_secondary_storage_domains] test).
But when running the current engine master with VDSM cutoff before the time
of failure, it passed
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/229/

This was the VDSM commit that *worked*
*Commit 5c8aff6177bdaa81ee11c20d417c9bb10e651fb8 by Francesco Romani
<http://jenkins.ovirt.org/user/fromani@redhat.com/>*

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skrivanek at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> > On 9 Apr 2017, at 09:42, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 9 April 2017 at 10:39, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> 1. The error:
> >> 2017-04-08 14:12:11,376-04 ERROR
> >> [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.JsonRpcClient] (ResponseWorker) [] Not
> able
> >> to update response for "fc0cef3f-d8fa-4074-b315-e36cc2f63fa1"
> >>
> >> Is still seen, not sure why.
> >>
> >> 2. MOM is not available (unrelated, but still a bug)
> >>
> >> 3. New error I have not seen in the past on host1
> >> (http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_
> master/6257/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic-suit-master-
> el7/test_logs/basic-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/
> lago-basic-suite-master-host1/_var_log/vdsm/vdsm.log
> >> ) :
> >>
> >> 2017-04-08 14:12:22,208-0400 WARN  (jsonrpc/6) [storage.LVM] lvm pvs
> failed:
> >> 5 [] ['  Failed to find physical volume
> >> "/dev/mapper/360014050eacbb3c8b21428fb6683f074".'] (lvm:325)
> >>
> >> 4. New warning:
> >> 2017-04-08 14:13:17,327-0400 WARN  (check/loop) [storage.asyncutils]
> Call
> >> <bound method DirectioChecker._check of <DirectioChecker
> >> /dev/0eb0f05c-0507-4f02-ba13-b8d865538d7a/metadata running
> >> next_check=4295183.36 at 0x2fb9190>> delayed by 1.43 seconds
> >> (asyncutils:138)
> >>
> >>
> >> Do we know when it began?
> >
> > Yes. I linked to the patch that seems to have started this.
>
> This should be easy to revert
> Working on it
> Then we’ll see what exactly is the culprit
>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Barak Korren
> > bkorren at redhat.com
> > RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
> > https://ifireball.wordpress.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20170410/75240fbe/attachment.html>