[ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master ] [ 27-04-2017 ] [add_hosts]

[Piotr Kliczewski]

Thank you!

30 kwi 2017 23:14 "Nadav Goldin" <ngoldin at redhat.com> napisał(a):

> OK - that is easier as it involves only the master suite. Should be
> fixed in [1], in [2] is the test run.
>
>
> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/76251/
> [2] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/342/console
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Piotr Kliczewski <pkliczew at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > I think it depends on which name we use when we add a host to the engine.
> > We need to be consistent and use the same host name when adding a host
> and a
> > fqdn for the host ip.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Piotr Kliczewski
> > <piotr.kliczewski at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Nadav,
> >>
> >> Thank you for working on this but we have one more issue with name
> >> resolution.
> >>
> >> I checked the last job you triggered and I noticed that vm migration
> >> failed due to similar issue between the hosts.
> >> Here is a piece of custom logs that you added:
> >>
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,675-0400 INFO  (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher] subject:
> >> ((('organizationName', u'Test'),), (('commonName',
> >> u'lago-basic-suite-master-host0'),)), key: organizationName, value:
> >> Test (sslutils:241)
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,675-0400 INFO  (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher] subject:
> >> ((('organizationName', u'Test'),), (('commonName',
> >> u'lago-basic-suite-master-host0'),)), key: commonName, value:
> >> lago-basic-suite-master-host0 (sslutils:241)
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,676-0400 INFO  (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher] src_addr:
> >> ::ffff:192.168.201.2, cn_addr: lago-basic-suite-master-host0
> >> (sslutils:262)
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,676-0400 INFO  (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher] src_addr_extracted:
> >> 192.168.201.2, cn_addr_extracted: lago-basic-suite-master-host0
> >> (sslutils:266)
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,677-0400 INFO  (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher]
> >> socket.gethostbyadd(src_addr)[0]:
> >> lago-basic-suite-master-host0.lago.local (sslutils:268)
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,678-0400 INFO  (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher] compare
> >> ::ffff:192.168.201.2, lago-basic-suite-master-host0, res: False
> >> (sslutils:244)
> >> 2017-04-30 14:23:35,678-0400 ERROR (Reactor thread)
> >> [ProtocolDetector.SSLHandshakeDispatcher] peer certificate does not
> >> match host name (sslutils:226)
> >>
> >> It looks like the engine issued certificate for
> >> 'lago-basic-suite-master-host0' but we resolve 192.168.201.2 to
> >> 'lago-basic-suite-master-host0.lago.local'.
> >> Can we fix it as well?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Piotr Kliczewski <pkliczew at redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Wow, great.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you!
> >> >
> >> > 30 kwi 2017 19:40 "Nadav Goldin" <ngoldin at redhat.com> napisał(a):
> >> >>
> >> >> Ok, I think the issue was the unqualified domain name. The
> certificate
> >> >> was generated(as before for 'engine') without the domain name, i.e.
> >> >> 'lago-basic-suite-master-engine', on VDSM side it resolved the IP to
> >> >> the address 'lago-basic-suite-master-engine.lago.local' and then
> >> >> failed comparing it to the unqualified one. I assume this is the
> >> >> expected behaviour, though not sure(as you can easily resolve
> >> >> 'lago-basic-suite-master-engine' to
> >> >> 'lago-basic-suite-master-engine.lago.local' on the hosts). It should
> >> >> be fixed in [1], just ran OST manual with the same debugging patch
> >> >> applied on top of yours, and at least add_hosts passed.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/76225/10
> >> >> [2] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/338/
> console
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Piotr Kliczewski <
> pkliczew at redhat.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Sure, will take look later today.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 30 kwi 2017 18:47 "Nadav Goldin" <ngoldin at redhat.com> napisał(a):
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks for the explanation.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I added some more debugging messages on top of your patch, could
> you
> >> >> >> please take a look at [1] and tell me what do you expect to
> resolve
> >> >> >> differently for this to work?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> [1]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/337/
> artifact/exported-artifacts/test_logs/basic-suite-master/
> post-002_bootstrap.py/lago-basic-suite-master-host0/_var_log/vdsm/vdsm.log
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20170430/299019f3/attachment.html>