<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Anton Marchukov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:amarchuk@redhat.com" target="_blank">amarchuk@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><p dir="ltr"><br>
> The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do.<br>
> An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find<br>
> any performance benefits from using them so far.</p>
</span><p dir="ltr">That's very surprising. On my case it doubles the performance, at least. But I assume my storage (single disk) is far slower than yours. <br></p></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>What amount of RAM you had available to Linux file system cache and were there any previous runs so Linux were able to put any mock caches into the RAM cache?</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't do mock. And if I run everything in RAM (whether directly under /dev/shm/<somewhere> or in a zram disk), I honestly don't need the Linux system cache.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>Besides the possible difference in disk speeds I think the second factor is this Linux fs cache that basically create an analog of RAM disk on the fly.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, theoretically, if you have enough RAM and you keep re-running, many of the data is indeed going to be cached. I'd argue that it's a better use of RAM to just run it there.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>Those two things might explain why we do not see any performance improvement from RAM drives in our case.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Indeed.</div><div>Y.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Anton.</div><div> </div></font></span></div>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>