<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 June 2017 at 09:38, Eyal Edri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eedri@redhat.com" target="_blank">eedri@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Barak Korren <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bkorren@redhat.com" target="_blank">bkorren@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">בתאריך 23 ביוני 2017 15:56, "Sandro Bonazzola" <<a href="mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com" target="_blank">sbonazzo@redhat.com</a>> כתב:<span class="m_1593936341842311181gmail-"><br type="attribution"><blockquote class="m_1593936341842311181gmail-m_3391961754136427291quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div>we dropped publishing vdsm ppc64le builds on snapshot repos due to issues keeping aligned nvr between x86_64 and ppc64le.</div><div><br></div><div>Today we're still missing ppc64le builds on <a href="http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/" target="_blank">http://resources.ovirt.org/pub<wbr>/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/pp<wbr>c64le/</a><br clear="all"><div><br></div><div>Where do we stand with the support for the build of the same nvr ob both arches?</div><div><br></div><div>Can we get it re-enabled?</div></div></div></blockquote></span></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Yes. We solved the issues we had with this a while ago with the new deploy-to-expetimental job. Are you sure the ppc64le builds are not making it to 'tested'? (Im assuming the builds themselves are enabled...)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I suppose the situation with 4.1 is a little different because it is not taking stuff from 'tested' yet...</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Sent [1], which should solve it.</div><div>Barak, the fact that we still publish nightly to 4.1 in the old way can somehow still cause issues for publishing both ppc64le and x86_64? </div><div>The only thing I can think of is if for a very slim chance, one of the builds of vdsm is running during the time publisher works resulting in a mismatch in the repo, right? </div><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>Yeah, not very probable.<br><br></div><div>Maybe we should just clean up the publishers and move 4.1 to use 'tested' too. Do we have a ticket about that?<br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Barak Korren<br>RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi<br>Red Hat EMEA<br><a href="http://redhat.com" target="_blank">redhat.com</a> | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | <a href="http://redhat.com/trusted" target="_blank">redhat.com/trusted</a></div>
</div></div>