we are partially live....

Carl Trieloff cctrieloff at redhat.com
Tue Sep 20 12:21:18 UTC 2011


On 09/19/2011 10:47 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> i.e., I find this statement a bit weak in supporting the fact most
> projects use a single (or dual) ack.
> "Single ack can be adopted by a project if explicitly stated so for
> non-substantial patches."
>
> "Single ack can be adopted by a project if explicitly stated so. More acks
> can be requested for patches requiring a more careful review."

yes that is better, updated.

Carl.



More information about the Project-planning mailing list