[Users] ovirt-node on Gentoo

Dimitrije Zivkovic dimitrije.ziv at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 11:23:05 UTC 2011


Hi,

  so, since I'm also migrating my system from OpenRC to systemd - pure
systemd, no OpenRC compatibility, would it be any help to set the condition
that ovirt-node requires systemd? I mean, the question here is ( and I
think it is worth asking it ) is it worth the time and effort to keep
parallel scripts and stuff?
If using systemd means that, for now, init standards are no longer an
issue, maybe that should be the way to go? Setup ovirt-node under systemd
for now and solve init scripts problems later? Is systemd mature enough to
inherit SysV or OpenRC completly? Or am I somehow wrong?
My system is working with systemd quite nice, no obvious problems so far...

PS. Maybe someone could point out what is the minimal set of services
needed to run on ovirt-node system/computer? So just to check if systemd
has needed scripts already...

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Doron Fediuck <dfediuck at redhat.com> wrote:

> Taking Dimitrije's issue as an example, we hit the first
> conflict; Gentoo is using OpenRC by default (and has some BSD-style
> leftovers), while RedHat and Fedora are using their SysV-style
> implementation, which confirms to LSB. Also, some Fedora services
> are moving to systemd implementation. Obviously these implementations
> are not trivial to bridge. So where Fedora's script will have
> "Required-Start:"
> Gentoo will use a depend() function (see vixie-cron as a sample).
> So unless we find a magical bridge for init standards, we'll have
> to have several init scripts, and each distro will use it's own
> script. We can try and generalize it, to make sure distor's
> with similar implementations use the same script.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20111121/f96acd5c/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list