[Users] Gluster storage

Dan Kenigsberg danken at redhat.com
Fri Jan 17 04:45:09 EST 2014


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:25:05AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Dan Kenigsberg  wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:04:03PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> There are two ways in which GlusterFS can be used as a storage domain:
> >>
> >> a) Use gluster native/fuse access with POSIXFS
> >>
> >> b) Use the gluster native storage domain to bypass fuse (with
> >> libgfapi). We are currently addressing an issue in libvirt
> >> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017289) to enable
> >> snapshot support with libgfapi. Once this is addressed, we will have
> >> libgfapi support in the native storage domain.
> >
> > It won't be as immediate, since there's a required fix on Vdsm's side
> > (Bug 1022961 - Running a VM from a gluster domain uses mount instead of
> > gluster URI)
> >
> >> Till then, fuse would
> >> be used with native storage domain. You can find more details about
> >> native storage domain here:
> >>
> >> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/GlusterFS_Storage_Domain
> rg/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> Hello,
> revamping here....
> I'm using oVirt 3.3.3 beta1 after upgrade from 3.3.2 on fedora 19
> ovirt beta repo
> It seems bug referred by Vijay (1017289) is still marked as
> "assigned", but actually it is for rhel 6.
> Bug referred by Dan (1022961) is marked as "blocked" but I don't see
> any particular updates since late november. But it is for rhevm, so I
> think it is for rhel 6...
> So what is the situation for fedora 19 and oVirt in upcoming 3.3.3?
> And upcoming fedora 19/20 and 3.4?

Neither bug has been fixed as of yet, I'm afraid.
You should seem them change state to POST when there's code to be seen.

Dan.


More information about the Users mailing list