[ovirt-users] Ovirt 4.0 to 4.1 CentOS7.3 and libvirtd 2.0.0 segfault issue

Yaniv Kaul ykaul at redhat.com
Fri Apr 21 15:41:23 UTC 2017


On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Rafał Wojciechowski <
it at rafalwojciechowski.pl> wrote:

> hi,
>
> my issue was related to bug in libvirtd.
> it was found in core dump by libvirt team
>
> "
>
> I'll send a patch to upstream libvirt to fix this crash.  However it can take
> a while to get it back to CentOS/RHEL.  The source of this crash is that you
> have a "tun0" network interface without IP address and that interface is
> checked before "ovirtmgmt" and it causes the crash.  You can workaround it
> by removing the "tun0" interface if it doesn't have any IP address.
>
> Pavel
>
> "
>
> workaround is working fine for me.
>

Thanks for following this!
Any idea how did you get to have the tun0 there in the first place?
Y.

Regards,
> Rafal Wojciechowski
>
> W dniu 18.04.2017 o 16:55, Rafał Wojciechowski pisze:
>
> hi,
>
> I was unable to just remove glibc and install it again - I have
> reinstalled it and rebooted the machine but it was not fixed anything
> Thanks anyway.
>
> Regards,
> Rafal Wojciechowski
> W dniu 18.04.2017 o 10:53, Yanir Quinn pisze:
>
> Hi Rafal
> not sure it relates to your issue, but i experienced a similar issue with
> segfault (running on fedora 25)
> to resolve it i had to remove glibc packages and then install them again
> (maybe a same workaround for libvirt will do the job here)
>
> Regards
> Yanir Quinn
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Francesco Romani <fromani at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 04/18/2017 08:09 AM, Rafał Wojciechowski wrote:
>> >
>> > hello,
>> >
>> > I made comparison(+diff) between xml passing through vdsm which is
>> > working and another one which cause libvirtd segfault
>> >
>> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/eqpe8Byu2l-3SRdXc6LTLl
>> 5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=
>> >
>> >
>> > I am not sure if below setting are fine but I dont know how to change
>> them
>> >
>> > <model heads="1" ram="65536" type="qxl" vgamem="16384" vram="8192" />
>> > (I dont have so much ram and vgamem)
>> >
>>
>> those are kibibytes though
>> (https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsVideo), are pretty
>> conservarvative settings
>> >
>> > <graphics autoport="yes" defaultMode="secure" passwd="*****"
>> > passwdValidTo="1970-01-01T00:00:01" port="-1" tlsPort="-1"
>> type="spice">
>> > (ports with "-"? maybe it is fine because of autoport settings...)
>> >
>>
>> Yes, "-1" means "autoallocation from libvirt".
>> I don't see obvious issues in this XML, and, most importantly, one
>> invalid XML should never cause libvirtd to segfault.
>>
>> I'd file a libvirt bug.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Francesco Romani
>> Senior SW Eng., Virtualization R&D
>> Red Hat
>> IRC: fromani github: @fromanirh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170421/231341d5/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list