<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Itamar Heim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:iheim@redhat.com" target="_blank">iheim@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 09/22/2012 08:58 AM, Josh Logan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I'm currently setting up an ovirt cluster and so far it looks good. I<br>
like the integration with Foreman <a href="http://theforeman.org/" target="_blank">http://theforeman.org/</a> .<br>
<br>
I would like to use Ceph / rbd for my storage. I saw some mention of<br>
patches coming in May, but I did not find any new posts.<br>
<br>
What is the status of this work? Is there some patches I can try out?<br>
I have a working Ceph cluster and a working ovirt cluster, I just need a<br>
way to bring them together.<br>
<br>
Thanks, JOSH<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
I don't remember any active work on this right now (for sure nothing like the gluster integration being done).<br>
but iiuc, ceph provides posixfs support - did you try creating a posixfs based storage domain?<br>
(you would need a "full" host (not ovirt-node) to install ceph client components on).<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Itamar<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>I am doing my work on Fedora 17 hosts, not ovirt-node, since I know this will need more OS support.<br><br>There are a few different Ceph filesystems. But the posix based one is the least ready for production. The rbd filesystem is integrated into qemu and libvirt is the most suited for VM images.<br>
<br>Are the Gluster patches available? I would like to see what that feature looks like and if I can modify them for Ceph.<br>If there is a better filesystem to investigate please let me know.<br><br>Thanks, JOSH<br><br>