<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/13 Yair Zaslavsky <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yzaslavs@redhat.com" target="_blank">yzaslavs@redhat.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi ALejandro,<br>
Officially we're not supporting Sambra4rc5, but I talked with Alon Bar-Lev (CC'ed) and he explained me Sambra4rc5 is 2003 AD compliant.<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi Yair</div><div>
I know it, but is very interesting the idea to avoid Microsoft solutions and move to OpenSource Enviroment.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
I am not sure why you had to add the cn part, can you elaborate?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I find the problem, isn't the cn, only when the user has a userPrincipalName is find by ovirt.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Probably will be a problem in migration from samba3 to samba4, will quest in samba4 technical list.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>
-- <br>Alejandro Escanero Blanco<br>Consultor de sistemas basados en fuentes abiertas<br>Desarrollador de FusionDirectory (<a href="http://www.fusiondirectory.org" target="_blank">http://www.fusiondirectory.org</a>)<br>Blog: <a href="http://www.disasterproject.com" target="_blank">http://www.disasterproject.com</a><br>
Jabber: <a href="mailto:blainett@jabberes.com" target="_blank">blainett@jabberes.com</a><br><br>
</div>