<div dir="ltr"><div>My 2 cents here.<br>I think what he masses would like to ultimately see here is a pure web based SPICE/VNC client nicely integrated into the user/admin portals. In this regard the console becomes truly portable across operating systems and browsers. The biggest win here is no longer having to be stuck with Internet Exploder as the only browser on a windows client that can access a spice console. At least on a Linux based client we have Firefox, but chrome would be nice. Due to the current console situation what is completely out in the cold here is tablets (granted you can use a vnc client on a tablet, but painful due to manual connection steps ip/port/password ATM). Likewise VNC != SPICE quality and interactivity wise on top of the other obvious advantages or SPICE over VNC (EG: HW Accel via QXL). Also left out here are OSX users for which a solution like this would console enable them as well.<br>
</div>- DHC<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Michal Skrivanek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michal.skrivanek@redhat.com" target="_blank">michal.skrivanek@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:10 , Jaco <<a href="mailto:ubuntumuntu@gmail.com">ubuntumuntu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I've seen this in the list archives, but not sure how much traction it's gained in the intervening period (or ).<br>
</div>Hi,<br>
still pending, but we're getting there:-)<br>
<div class="im"><br>
><br>
> I've fiddled with, and had some pretty decent experiences with Guacamole: <a href="http://guac-dev.org/" target="_blank">http://guac-dev.org/</a><br>
> An HTML(5?)-based VNC client for a browser - no client-side components needed :)<br>
</div>how would you compare it to novnc?<br>
RDP support might be handy…on the other hand at first sight looking at <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/guacamole/forums/forum/1110834/topic/5236646" target="_blank">http://sourceforge.net/projects/guacamole/forums/forum/1110834/topic/5236646</a> and <a href="http://cloudiad.com/analysis/doc1" target="_blank">http://cloudiad.com/analysis/doc1</a><br>
it looks noVNC would be easier to integrate with. Especially when qemu just recently got direct support for websockets. Then we really do not need anything at the engine side at all.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
michal<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">><br>
> Could fit in nicely with the project.<br>
><br>
> Just putting it out there<br>
><br>
> - J<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>