<div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">hi,&nbsp;<span style="white-space: pre-wrap; line-height: 1.7;">Dan&nbsp;Kenigsberg</span><div><span style="white-space: pre-wrap;">yes, i am working on this feature, the goal is that HOST can supply bridge and NAT network meanwhile ,users can choise.</span></div><div><span style="white-space: pre-wrap;">because birdge network occupy too many IPs,&nbsp;at least, one user will have 2 IPs(VM and thin client).</span></div><div><br><br><br><br><div></div><div id="divNeteaseMailCard"></div><br><pre><br>At&nbsp;2013-03-07&nbsp;19:28:29,"Dan&nbsp;Kenigsberg"&nbsp;&lt;danken@redhat.com&gt;&nbsp;wrote:
&gt;On&nbsp;Thu,&nbsp;Mar&nbsp;07,&nbsp;2013&nbsp;at&nbsp;06:49:20PM&nbsp;+0800,&nbsp;bigclouds&nbsp;wrote:
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;why&nbsp;ovirt&nbsp;&nbsp;does&nbsp;not&nbsp;support&nbsp;NAT&nbsp;network?
&gt;
&gt;Would&nbsp;you&nbsp;elaborate&nbsp;on&nbsp;that?
&gt;
&gt;Do&nbsp;you&nbsp;refer&nbsp;to&nbsp;putthing&nbsp;VMs&nbsp;behind&nbsp;a&nbsp;NAT,&nbsp;instead&nbsp;of&nbsp;a&nbsp;bridge?
</pre></div></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span>