<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Itamar Heim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:iheim@redhat.com" target="_blank">iheim@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, <a href="mailto:emitor@gmail.com" target="_blank">emitor@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
But, if i want HA, if the host were the vm it's running lost<br>
connectivity with the manager, the vm should start in other host of the<br>
cluster right?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
HA is currently controlled by the engine, which needs to know the VM isn't running on the host to launch it on another host.<br>
we're looking at relying on sanlock for engine to be able to launch the VM on another host without fencing the first host.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Hi, on RHEV 3.x it works as emitor needs, oVirt has another behavior ?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div>