<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div><div>Yes Karli,</div><div>These are different daemons. </div><div><br></div><div></div></div><br><br>-------- הודעה מקורית --------<br>מאת: Karli Sjöberg <Karli.Sjoberg@slu.se> <br>תאריך:08/01/2014 08:44 (GMT+02:00) <br>אל: dfediuck@redhat.com <br>עותק: amedeo@oscert.net,users@ovirt.org,tmiller@hcjb.org <br>נושא: Re: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression <br><br>ons 2014-01-08 klockan 01:35 -0500 skrev Doron Fediuck:<br>> Hi guys, <br>> As far as I know, tuned is not available in centos. So we first need<br>> to verify tuned exists.<br><br>Are "ksmtuned" and "tuned" different?<br># cat /etc/redhat-release <br>CentOS release 6.5 (Final)<br># service --status-all | grep tuned<br>ksmtuned (pid 10438) is running...<br># chkconfig | grep tuned<br>ksmtuned 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off<br><br>/K<br><br>> Once available, we'll be able to handle<br>> the relevant profiles for hypervisors.<br>> <br>> <br>> Can anyone confirm tuned availability on centos?<br>> <br>> <br> <-------- הודעה מקורית --------<br> <מאת: Amedeo Salvati <br> <תאריך:08/01/2014 00:32 (GMT+02:00) <br> <אל: users@ovirt.org,tmiller@hcjb.org <br> <נושא: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla<br> <orRegression <br>> <br>> Hi Ted,<br>> <br>> <br>> I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I<br>> can find it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host<br>> profile?<br>> <br>> <br>> Best regards<br>> a<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44 +0000<br>> From: Ted Miller <tmiller@hcjb.org><br>> To: oVirt Mailing List <users@ovirt.org><br>> Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or<br>> Regression<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628b@DM2PR05MB320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com><br>> <br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.<br>> <br>> One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At<br>> the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just<br>> a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a<br>> warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.<br>> <br>> When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a<br>> "rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos.<br>> I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.<br>> <br>> I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla<br>> 987293<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293>;, where<br>> "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV +<br>> RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine<br>> RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not<br>> appropriate.<br>> <br>> My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses<br>> "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it<br>> falls back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences<br>> there are between the two profiles.)<br>> <br>> Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other<br>> path?<br>> <br>> Ted Miller<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Inviato da Tablet Samsung<br><br>-- <br><br>Med Vänliga Hälsningar<br><br>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Karli Sjöberg<br>Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address<br>Kronåsvägen 8)<br>S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden<br>Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66<br>karli.sjoberg@slu.se<div><br></div></body>