<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>Hi guys, </div><div>As far as I know, tuned is not available in centos. So we first need to verify tuned exists.</div><div>Once available, we'll be able to handle</div><div>the relevant profiles for hypervisors.</div><div><br></div><div>Can anyone confirm tuned availability on centos?</div><br><br>-------- הודעה מקורית --------<br>מאת: Amedeo Salvati <amedeo@oscert.net> <br>תאריך:08/01/2014 00:32 (GMT+02:00) <br>אל: users@ovirt.org,tmiller@hcjb.org <br>נושא: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression <br><br><div><div>Hi Ted,</div><div><br></div><div>I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I can find it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host profile?</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards</div><div>a</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Date: <a href="calendar:T7:Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44">Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44</a> +0000<br>From: Ted Miller <<a href="mailto:tmiller@hcjb.org">tmiller@hcjb.org</a>><br>To: oVirt Mailing List <<a href="mailto:users@ovirt.org">users@ovirt.org</a>><br>Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or<br>Regression<br>Message-ID:<br><<a href="mailto:a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628b@DM2PR05MB320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com">a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628b@DM2PR05MB320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com</a>><br><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.<br><br>One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.<br><br>When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.<br><br>I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293<<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293%3E">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293></a>;, where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.<br><br>My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two profiles.)<br><br>Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?<br><br>Ted Miller</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:100%">Inviato da Tablet Samsung</div></div></div> </body>