<p dir="ltr">There's are already enaugh articles on the web about NFS problems related locking, latency, etc.... Eh stacking a protocol onto another to fix problem and then maybe one more to glue them together.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Google for the suse PDF " why NFS sucks", I don't agree with the whole sheet.. NFS got his place,too. But not as production filer for VM.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Juergen, the NFS lover</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 9, 2014 8:10 AM, "Markus Stockhausen" <<a href="mailto:stockhausen@collogia.de">stockhausen@collogia.de</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
> Von: <a href="mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org">users-bounces@ovirt.org</a> [<a href="mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org">users-bounces@ovirt.org</a>]" im Auftrag von "squadra [<a href="mailto:squadra@gmail.com">squadra@gmail.com</a>]<br>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014 17:15<br>
> An: <a href="mailto:users@ovirt.org">users@ovirt.org</a><br>
> Betreff: Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage?<br>
><br>
> better go for iscsi or something else... i whould avoid nfs for vm hosting<br>
> Freebsd10 delivers kernel iscsitarget now, which works great so far. or go with omnios to get comstar iscsi, which is a rocksolid solution<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
><br>
> Juergen<br>
<br>
That is usually a matter of taste and the available environment.<br>
The minimal differences in performance usually only show up<br>
if you drive the storage to its limits. I guess you could help Sven<br>
better if you had some hard facts why to favour ISCSI.<br>
<br>
Best regards.<br>
<br>
Markus</blockquote></div>