<div dir="ltr">Thanks, I will take a look at it, anyone else currently using Gluster for backend images in production? </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><br>><><br>nathan stratton | vp technology | broadsoft, inc | +1-240-404-6580 | <a href="http://www.broadsoft.com" target="_blank">www.broadsoft.com</a></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Itamar Heim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:iheim@redhat.com" target="_blank">iheim@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 06/09/2014 01:28 PM, Nathan Stratton wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
So I understand that the news is still fresh and there may not be much<br>
going on yet in making Ceph work with ovirt, but I thought I would reach<br>
out and see if it was possible to hack them together and still use<br>
librdb rather then NFS.<br>
<br>
I know, why not just use Gluster... the problem is I have tried to use<br>
Gluster for VM storage for years and I still don't think it is ready.<br>
Ceph still has work in other areas, but this is one area where I think<br>
it shines. This is a new lab cluster and I would like to try to use ceph<br>
over gluster if possible.<br>
<br>
Unless I am missing something, can anyone tell me they are happy with<br>
Gluster as a backend image store? This will be a small 16 node 10 gig<br>
cluster of shared compute / storage (yes I know people want to keep them<br>
separate).<br>
<br>
><><br>
nathan stratton | vp technology | broadsoft, inc | <a href="tel:%2B1-240-404-6580" value="+12404046580" target="_blank">+1-240-404-6580</a> |<br>
</div></div><a href="http://www.broadsoft.com" target="_blank">www.broadsoft.com</a> <<a href="http://www.broadsoft.com" target="_blank">http://www.broadsoft.com</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
there was a threat about this recently. afaict, ceph support will require adding a specific ceph storage domain to engine and vdsm, which is a full blown feature (I assume you could try and hack it somewhat with a custom hook). waiting for next version planning cycle to see if/how it gets pushed.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>