<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29-7-2015 13:59, Jorick Astrego
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55B8C033.10108@netbulae.eu" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
For RHEV I don't have an answer.<br>
<br>
But for anyone that cares, we've been running oVirt 3.5 and
GlusterFS 3.6 for about three months in production now. We run a
Gluster cluster and a seperate virtualization hosts cluster. The
Gluster cluster is installed, configured and managed seperately
from oVirt as there is no way to have a seperate storage network
in oVirt 3.5<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
I run something comparable but using a split dns to get a separate
storage network but also a storage cluster and virt cluster. The
storage is managed through ovirt though because of the split-dns.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55B8C033.10108@netbulae.eu" type="cite"> There
have been no specific incompatibility issues, so we are very
happy. But as we don't use every feature mileage may vary.<br>
</blockquote>
Question: do you use fuse mounts or libgfapi?<br>
<br>
I use libgfapi in test, using special vdsm packages and need to test
if rebooting gluster nodes has an impact on running VMs. Select
GlusterFS storage domain in oVirt isn't guaranteed to give you
libgfapi!<br>
<br>
Joop<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>