<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 24 August 2016 at 12:32, Christophe TREFOIS <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:christophe.trefois@uni.lu" target="_blank">christophe.trefois@uni.lu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
Really? That’s strange, as the engine should be backward compatible with previous versions no?
<div><br></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>Think about it like this - When an update comes out it gets pushed to the repos/channels. If you then go and provision a new host with some automated system like Foreman, you end up with the new VDSM. Also, since you can have a large amount of hosts, you may reasonably choose to use some automated system to keep them up to date. It is more reasonable to expect the engine machine to have a steadier/slower life cycle.<br></div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><b>Barak Korren</b><br></div><div><a href="mailto:bkorren@redhat.com" target="_blank">bkorren@redhat.com</a><br></div>RHEV-CI Team<br></div></div>
</div></div>