<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-09-23 15:57 GMT+02:00 Sahina Bose <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sabose@redhat.com" target="_blank">sabose@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br><div dir="ltr"><span class="gmail-"></span><div>You could do this - where Node3 & Node 2 also has arbiter bricks. Arbiter bricks only store metadata and requires very low storage capacity compared to the data bricks.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Node1 Node2 Node3 Node4 <br></div><div>brick1 brick1 arb-brick<br></div><div> arb-brick brick1 brick1<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ok, cool! And this won't pose any problem if Node2 or Node4 fail?<br><br></div><div>The syntax shuld be this:<br><br></div><div>gluster volume create data replica 3 arbiter 1 node1:/brick node2:/brick node2:/arb_brick node3:/brick node4:/brick node4:/arb_brick<br><br></div><div>is not a problem having more than a brick on the same host for the volume create syntax?<br><br></div><div>Thanks again<br><br></div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Davide Ferrari<br></div>Senior Systems Engineer<br></div></div>
</div></div>