<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 4 January 2017 at 11:06, Nir Soffer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com" target="_blank">nsoffer@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Barak Korren <<a href="mailto:bkorren@redhat.com">bkorren@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 4 January 2017 at 09:57, Roy Golan <<a href="mailto:rgolan@redhat.com">rgolan@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I'm getting the feeling I'm not alone in this, authoring and publishing a<br>
>> wiki page isn't as used to be for long time.<br>
><br>
> Maybe we're using the wrong tool for the job?<br>
> The site is intentionally not a wiki to allow OSAS some editorial<br>
> control over what goes on the public site.<br>
><br>
> I'm guessing that the scenario you are talking about here is a<br>
> developer looking to create a preliminary design document for further<br>
> discussion. Maybe we need a different tool and process for that?<br>
<br>
</span>I agree, we are using the wrong tool for the job of putting initial design<br>
for discussion.<br>
<br>
For publishing user documentation the site is ok.<br>
<br>
I miss the wiki we had, it was easier to use for development of feature<br>
pages and developer documentation.<br></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>Who is our OSAS contact these days? <br><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Nir<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>