<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">>> I would say that each path has its own device (and therefore its own queue). So I'd argue that you may want to have (for example) 4 paths to each LUN or perhaps more (8?).
For example, with 2 NICs, each connecting to two controllers, each controller having 2 NICs (so no SPOF and nice number of paths).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Totally get where you are coming from with paths to LUN’s and using multipath. We do use that with the Dell Compellent storage we have. It has multiple active controllers each
with an IP address in a different subnet. Unfortunately, the Equallogic does NOT have two active controllers. It has a single active controller and a single IP that migrates between the controllers when either one is active. If I don’t use LACP I can’t use
both HBA’s on the host with Ovirt as it doesn’t support Dells host integration tool (HIT) software (or you could argue Dell don’t support Ovirt).
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">So, instead of being able to have a large number of paths to devices I can either have one active path or LACP and get two. As two is the most I can have to a LUN with the infrastructure
we have, we spread the IO by increasing the number of targets (storage domains).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">>> Depending on your storage, you may want to use rr_min_io_rq = 1 for latency purposes.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Looking at the man page for multipath.conf it looks like the default is now 1, where it was 1000 for rr_min_io. For now I’ve just removed it from our config file and we’ll
take the default.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">I’m still seeing the same problem with the couple of changes made (lvmetad and multipath). I’m really not very good at understanding exactly what is going on in the Ovirt logs.
Does it provide any clues as to why it brings the host up and then takes it offline again? What are the barrage of lvm processes trying to achieve and why do they apparently fail (as it keeps on trying to run them)? As mentioned, throughout all this I see
no multipath errors (all paths available), I see no iSCSI connection errors to the Equallogic. It just seems to be Ovirt that thinks the storage is unavailable for some reason?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Mark<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>