<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Fernando Frediani <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br" target="_blank">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Well, I just found that Teaming doesn't seem to be recognized by oVirt, only Bonding. Am I correct ?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, that's correct. Does it make a difference in your deployment?</div><div>Y.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Fernando</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 30/01/2017 12:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Has anyone used NIC Teaming in production with oVirt Node ? How are you finding it compared to Bonding ?<br>
<br>
Has it helped in some way with the new features it brings.<br>
<br>
For example: one feature VMware does it when you create a given portgroup for a group of VMs you may set that portgroup to use one physical NIC as Active and others as Backup, while in another portgroup you may set otherwise. Then you have both failover for both portgroups and better bandwidth usage.<br>
<br>
Does Teaming do that kind of thing when used along with oVirt/libvirt+KVM ?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Fernando<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>