<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Nathanaël Blanchet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:blanchet@abes.fr" target="_blank">blanchet@abes.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="m_-6614715412030746997m_5385279511923747685gmail-"><div><br>
</div>
</span>
<div>If you use a dedicated host, you
might as well abandon self hosted. HE is
nice for small setups with the HA built
in for extra fun, but once you scale, it
might not be able to cope and you'll
need real hardware. You're running a
heavy-ish java engine plus two databases
after all. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I'd be interested to know what type of scale needs a real hardware
for engine, rather 100 vms or 1000 vms? it may be about the hosts
number?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>YMMV of course. But it only stands to reason, that a certain amount of load is going to overwhelm a single VM. VMWare also have a scale limitation on the VM based vcenter btw </div></div><br></div></div>