<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Edward Haas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ehaas@redhat.com" target="_blank">ehaas@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>I think that Gianluca is referring to: <a href="https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/74707" target="_blank">https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/<wbr>74707</a><br><br></div>We seem to block the scenario where a slave of a bond has a VLAN on top of it.<br><br></div>Thanks,<br></div>Edy.<br></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danken@redhat.com" target="_blank">danken@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I am not sure I understand your question, though it reminds me of<br>
<br>
Bug 1372798 - Setupnetworks not removing the "BRIDGE=" entry in ifcfg<br>
file when changing a untagged network to tagged<br>
<br>
which Vdsm version do you have? can you share your supervdsm.log?<br>
<div><div class="m_150841359660245497h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, I mean a scenario where I have already in place a vlan on an interface that would become part of a bond created by oVirt</div><div>And I want to retain that vlan configuration.</div><div>I remember a thread where something similar was referred, with a parameter inside vdsm.conf, but I'm not able to find it...</div><div>I don't remember if that setting was targeted at ignoring the particular network interface as a whole, actually..</div><div>I would like to have eth3.100 and eth4.100 as single interfaces pointing to an iSCSI storage, but also use (throuch oVirt configuration) a bond0 device with eth3 and eth4 as slaves</div><div>So that VMs vlans with ID xx would be defined on bond0.xx and bridges with those bonds as interfaces</div><div><br></div><div>Does the gerrit change reported by you, Edward, go to correct the incompatibility?</div><div>In case in which version do I find it? </div><div>In case not possible can I sort of manually force this config and have oVirt accept it, even if not able to automagically create it?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Gianluca </div></div></div></div>