<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Title" content="">
<meta name="Keywords" content="">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:Calibri;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:Calibri;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:Calibri;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">So I successfully upgraded my engine from 4.06 to 4.1.1 with no major issues.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">A nice thing I noticed was that my custom CA certificate for https on the admin and user portals wasn’t clobbered by setup.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">I did have to restore my custom settings for ISO uploader, log collector, and websocket proxy:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">cp /etc/ovirt-engine/isouploader.conf.d/10-engine-setup.conf.<latest_timestamp> /etc/ovirt-engine/isouploader.conf.d/10-engine-setup.conf<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">cp /etc/ovirt-engine/ovirt-websocket-proxy.conf.d/10-setup.conf.<latest_timestamp> /etc/ovirt-engine/ovirt-websocket-proxy.conf.d/10-setup.conf<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">cp /etc/ovirt-engine/logcollector.conf.d/10-engine-setup.conf.<latest_timestamp> /etc/ovirt-engine/logcollector.conf.d/10-engine-setup.conf<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Now I’m moving on to updating the oVirt node hosts, which are currently at oVirt Node 4.0.6.1. (I’m assuming I should do that before attempting to upgrade the cluster and data center compatibility level to
4.1.)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">When I right-click on a host and go to Installation / Check for Upgrade, the results are ‘no updates found.’ When I log into that host directly, I notice it’s still got the oVirt 4.0 repo, not 4.1. Is there
an extra step I’m missing? The documentation I’ve found (<a href="http://www.ovirt.org/documentation/upgrade-guide/chap-Updates_between_Minor_Releases/)">http://www.ovirt.org/documentation/upgrade-guide/chap-Updates_between_Minor_Releases/)</a> doesn’t mention
this. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">**<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">If I can offer some unsolicited feedback: I feel like this list is populated with a lot of questions that could be averted with a little care and feeding of the documentation. It’s unfortunate because that
makes for a rocky introduction to oVirt, and it makes it look like a neglected project, which I know is not the case.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">On a related note, I know this has been discussed before but…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The centralized control in Github for the documentation does not really encourage user contributions. What’s wrong with a wiki? If we’re really concerned about bad or malicious edits being posted, keep the
official in git and add a separate wiki that is clearly marked as user-contributed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">**<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Daniel<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>