<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>But then quorum doesn't replicate data 3 times, does it ?</p>
    <p>Fernando<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/04/2017 10:24, Denis Chaplygin
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CANVzE5kfHSF15iwRYxagU-rSEvN60XSZcjc8jVSTrKdYuXeeEg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Hello!<br>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:02 PM,
            FERNANDO FREDIANI <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank"
                href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com">fernando.frediani@upx.com</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px
              solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"
              class="gmail_quote">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Out of curiosity, why do you and
                people in general use more replica 3 than replica 2 ? </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>The answer is simple - quorum. With just two
              participants you don't know what to do, when your peer is
              unreachable. When you have three participants, you are
              able to establish a majority. In that case, when two
              partiticipants are able to communicate, they now, that
              lesser part of cluster knows, that it should not accept
              any changes.<br>
            </div>
            <div> </div>
            <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px
              solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"
              class="gmail_quote">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                <p>If I understand correctly this seems overkill and
                  waste of storage as 2 copies of data (replica 2) 
                  seems pretty reasonable similar to RAID 1 and still in
                  the worst case the data can be replicated after a
                  fail. I see that replica 3 helps more on performance
                  at the cost of space.</p>
                <span class="gmail-HOEnZb"></span><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          You are absolutely right. You need two copies of data to
          provide data redundancy and you need three (or more) members
          in cluster to provide distinguishable majority. Therefore we
          have arbiter volumes, thus solving that issue [1]. <br>
          <br>
          [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/arbiter-volumes-and-quorum/">https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/arbiter-volumes-and-quorum/</a><br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>