I also agree with the proposal.  It's sad to turn in my keys but I'm likely unable to perform many duties expected of a maintainer at this point.  I know that people can still find me via the git history :)

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 3:37 AM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:33 PM Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 11/27/19 3:25 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> > I want to remove inactive contributors from vdsm-master-maintainers.
>> >
>> > I suggest the simple rule of 2 years of inactivity for removing from
>> > this group,
>> > based on git log.
>> >
>> > See the list below for current status:
>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/groups/106,members
>> No objections, keeping the list minimal and current is a good idea.
> I love removing dead code; I feel a bit different about removing old
> colleagues. Maybe I'm just being nostalgic.
> If we introduce this policy (which I understand is healthy), let us
> give a long warning period (6 months?) before we apply the policy to
> existing dormant maintainers. We should also make sure that we
> actively try to contact a person before he or she is dropped.

I think this is a reasonable proposal.

Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/QCMGKR2IRYTITM2T3YMLXGOZCT4BHYGL/


Adam Litke

He / Him / His

Principle Software Engineer

Red Hat


@RedHat   Red Hat  Red Hat