Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <
ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Top posting
>
> 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
> will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
> this decision. (as Niels stated)
>
> 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
> now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
> the best outcome for this issue
Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster*
packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do
now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29 or backport it on Fedora 28
Niels
>
> Shyam
>
> On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >>>> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to
> >>>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
> >>>> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> >>>>
> >>>> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> >>>> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which
> >>>> should work with current oVirt code.
> >>>
> >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
> >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> >>>
> >>> HTH,
> >>> Niels
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> >>
> >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
> >
> > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> > few days?
> >
> > Niels
> >
