On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:

On 16 November 2017 at 10:30, Martin Sivak <msivak@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these,
>> like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users to
>> understand.
>> We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user
>> facing documentation.
>
> And yet we require the user to select a team using the same terms when
> filing a new bug..
>
> I agree with you, but I think the mandatory field in bugzilla is
> another candidate for consideration.

I've no disagreement with this statement, then again, I don't know
much about the complex reasons behind the selection of fields used in
bugzilla.

Nothing complex, to be honest.

The bugzilla "oVirt team" fields come to reflect the different teams owning a bug.

Those are valuable for the teams, but some also make sense for users (virt/storage/infra/network/dwh/node), while others might be a bit more confusing (ux/integration/SLA).

Not sure what VDSM is with regards to the feature pages? maybe for old features? I assume we can merge it into one of the others.

And we can send some explanation upstream (or better add one to the website) if that helps.

--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel