There is no misuse when optional argument is not used. But hosted engine uses the timeout parameter anyway so you can assume it is not a blocker for us.

Martin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:

As Irit mentioned the provided reproduction steps are wrong (misuse of the code) and she posted correct example showing that jsonrpc code works as expected. So Martin/Simone are you using somewhere in HE code the original example that is misusing the client?

Thanks

Martin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourfali@redhat.com> wrote:

From the latest comment it doesn't seem like a blocker to me.

Martin S. - your thoughts?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:

We have a proposed blocker for the release:

1527155

Infra

vdsm

Bindings-API

igoihman@redhat.com

NEW

jsonrpc reconnect logic does not work and gets stuck

urgent

unspecified

ovirt-4.2.0

04:30:30

Please review and either approve the blcoker or postpone to 4.2.1.

Thanks,

--

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D

Red Hat EMEA

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

--

Martin Perina
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.